Total Quality Management: Practices to Leverage Its Principles in Distance Higher Education

The growth of distance learning in higher education has been gaining market share. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced this trend. Enrollments are increasing sharply while fierce competition is a threat to distance learning institutions. To conquer and retain distance learning students, it is necessary to offer quality services and products, seeking innovation and continuous improvement to meet their needs. However, studies that analyze the application of the principles and practices of TQM (Total Quality Management) in distance higher education are still scarce. From this perspective, this study seeks to identify practices that increase the presence of TQM principles in distance higher education institutions. The qualitative research was carried out with managers from 64 teaching centers of one of the largest distance learning institutions in Brazil. The pillars of TQM considered in this study are leadership, staff, students, technological resources and continuous improvement. This study contributed to the literature by identifying practices to expand the presence of TQM principles in distance higher education adopted by the studied institution and its teaching centers. Management contributions are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 117.69 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 158.24 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Total Quality Management Fundamentals and Evolving Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions

Chapter © 2020

Total Quality Management in Educational Institutions

Chapter © 2017

Quality in Distance Learning Courses: A Longitudinal Survey of Teacher Training in Federal Programs

Chapter © 2016

References

  1. Alsoud, A.R., Harasis, A.A.: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student’s e-learning experience in Jordan. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer 16, 1404–1414 (2021) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sbaffi, L., Bennett, J.: Postgraduate students’ experience of a jointly-taught, distance learning degree: the example of a Russell group university. J. Higher Educ. Policy Manag. 41(6), 600–618 (2019) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Prakash, G.: Quality in higher education institutions: insights from the literature. TQM J. 30(6), 732–748 (2018) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nasim, K.: Role of internal and external organizational factors in TQM implementation: a systematic literature review and theoretical framework. Int. J. Q. Reliability Manag. 35(5), 1014–1033 (2018) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Baig, S.A., Abrar, M., Ali, A., Ahmad, M.: Implementation of TQM on higher education in Pakistan (short communication). Qual. Quant. 49(1), 51–56 (2013) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mehta, N., Prakash, V., Nitin, S.: Total quality management implementation in engineering education in India: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 25(1–2), 124–140 (2014) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Souza, M.A., Borchardt, M., Pereira, G.M., Viegas, C.V.: TQM at car dealerships with better sales performance: a multiple case study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 31, 13–14 (2020) Google Scholar
  8. Khan, M.A.: An empirical study of barriers in implementing total quality management in service organizations in Pakistan. Asian J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2(4), 155–161 (2011) Google Scholar
  9. Martínez-Lorente, A.R., Dewhurst, F., Dale, B.G.: Total quality management: origins and evolution of the term. TQM Mag. 10(5), 378–386 (1998) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Garvin, D.A.: Building a learning organization. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71(4), 78–91 (1993) Google Scholar
  11. Juran, J., Gryna, F.: Quality Control. Makron Books, São Paulo (1991) Google Scholar
  12. Merli, G.: Eurochallenge: the TQM Approach to Capturing Global Markets. IFS, UK (1993) Google Scholar
  13. Todorut, A.M.: The need of total quality management in higher education. In: 2nd world conference on educational technology researches (WCETR2012), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences vol. 83, pp. 1105–1110 (2013) Google Scholar
  14. Carvalho, M.M., Paladini, E.P.: Quality Management: Theory and Cases. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro (2005) Google Scholar
  15. Coltro, A.A.: Total quality management and its influences on business competitiveness. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração 1(2), 106–107 (1996) Google Scholar
  16. Paladini, E.P.: Quality Management: theory and practice, 2. ed. Atlas, São Paulo (2007) Google Scholar
  17. Pedrotti, R.F.: Communication as a Quality Strategy in Organizational Management. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora (2012) Google Scholar
  18. Martínez-Caro, E., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Cepeda-Carrión, G.: An application of the performance-evaluation model for E-learning quality in higher education. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 26(5–6), 632–647 (2015) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mello, C.H.P., Silva, C.E.S., Turriosi, J.B., Souza, L.G.M.: ISO 9001:2008: Quality Management System for Production Operations and Services. Atlas, São Paulo (2009) Google Scholar
  20. Saraph, J.V., Benson, P.G., Schroeder, R.G.: An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decis. Sci. 20(4), 810–829 (1989) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sordan, J.E., Marinho, C.A., Angeloni, M.: Assessment of perceived quality in a higher education institution: an action research. In: III National Production Engineering Symposium, vol. 3, no. 3, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados (2021) Google Scholar
  22. Clemes, M.D., Cohen, D., Wang, Y.: Understanding Chinese university students’ experiences: an empirical analysis. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 25(3), 391–427 (2013) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P., Johnson, D.M.: Service quality in higher education. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 20(2), 139–152 (2009) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Beketova, E., Leontyeva, I., Zubanova, S., Gryaznukhin, A., Movchun, V.: Creating an optimal environment for distance learning in higher education: discovering leadership issues. Palgrave Commun 6(1), 1–6 (2020) Google Scholar
  25. Sallis, E.: Total Quality Management in Education, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London (2002) Google Scholar
  26. Tan, A.H.T., Muskat, B., Zehrer, A.: A systematic review of quality of student experience in higher education. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 8(2), 209–228 (2016) Google Scholar
  27. Bryk, A.S., Sebring, P.B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J.Q., Luppescu, S.: Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2010) Google Scholar
  28. Galeon, D.H., Garcia, P.G., dela Cruz, J.: E-learning roadmap for open distance learning in Cordillera Administrative Region. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 482 (1), 012012 (2019) Google Scholar
  29. Garrison, D.R.: E-learning in the 21st Century: a Framework for Research and Practice. Routledge, Abingdon (2011) BookGoogle Scholar
  30. Gay, G., Betts, K.: From distance forums to meetings: integrating high touch strategies to increase student engagement, academic performance, and retention in large online courses. Online Learn. J. 24(1), 92–117 (2020) Google Scholar
  31. Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M.W.: Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87(4), 765–780 (2002) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Neborsky, E., et al.: Transition to distance learning under COVID-19 in assessments by professors. J. Phys. Conf. Series 1691(1), 100 (2021) Google Scholar
  33. Razik, T.A., Swanson, A.D.: Fundamental Concepts of Educational Leadership and Management, 4th edn. Allyn e Bacon, Boston (2010) Google Scholar
  34. Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y. B., Sungkur, R. K., Maudarbocus, M. I., Greller, W.: Enabling continuous improvement in online teaching and learning through e-learning capability and maturity assessment. Bus. Process Manag. J. 26, 1687–1707 (2020) Google Scholar
  35. Nadiri, H., Kandampully, J., Hussain, K.: Students’ perceptions of service quality in higher education. Total Q. Manag. Bus. Excell. 20(5), 523–535 (2009) ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bradbury, B.: A mixed methods study of distance learning graduate students’ motivation and program satisfaction at an American State University. In: VII International Scientific and Technical Internet Conference, pp. 11–15. Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk, Belarus (2019) Google Scholar
  37. Ribeiro, J. L.D., Milan, G.S.: Individual interviews: theory and applications. FEENG/UFGRS, Porto Alegre (2004) Google Scholar
  38. Cavalcanti, L.M.R., Guerra, M.G.G.V., Gomes, C.S.F.: Evaluation of higher education courses in Brazil: the SINAES in its relationship with quality. Eccos Revista Científica 56, 1–20 (2021) Google Scholar
  39. Yin, R.K.: Case Study: Planning and Methods. 5th ed. Bookman Editora, Porto Alegre (2015) Google Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNISINOS University, Avenue UNISINOS, RS, 950-93022-000, São Leopoldo, Brazil Márcia Helena Borges Notarjacomo, Bruna Strapazzon Do Couto, Fernanda Bica de Almeida, Miriam Borchart & Giancarlo Medeiros Pereira
  1. Márcia Helena Borges Notarjacomo